Even in one of the most prosperous and highly educated counties in the United States, less than half of high school graduates are ready for college.
Only 48% of Westchester County high school graduates are prepared to do college-level work. This measure is based on students scoring “at least 75 on their English Regents exam and at least 80 on a math Regents exam”.
For my local high school, located in Westchester County, 64% of graduates are considered college ready. This is a school district that spends about $25,000 per student each year and enjoys a student/teacher ratio of 14:1.
Using AP participation figures, US News determined that my local high school has a College Readiness Index of 44.5
On a national basis “SAT scores indicate ‘most freshmen aren’t academically prepared for college’”, so it appears this problem is not limited to high schools near me.
Are these college readiness numbers surprising? Should they be higher, given the resources being devoted to education? Or is it unrealistic to expect higher percentages of college-ready high school graduates, even in some of the most affluent areas of the country?
Some possible reasons for the low number of high school graduates who are prepared to do college-level work:
- The measures are flawed and do not give an accurate representation.
- Teaching and/or curriculum is mediocre, or worse.
- Schools do no place sufficient focus on academic goals, specifically on preparing students for college.
- We’re not spending enough on education.
- The money we spend on education is used inefficiently.
- No matter the demographics and despite how much a school tries, a certain percentage of high school graduates will never be ready for college work.
- “Kids these days.”
- Parents are not doing enough to support their children’s education.
I dismiss the first reason listed, having some familiarity with the New York State tests used to measure college readiness. A high school student on the college-prep track should definitely be able to meet the scores required. These tests are notoriously easy and/or graded on a very forgiving curve.
Achievement levels do not correlate closely with money spent on education, so I cannot see #4 being an important reason.
The rest of the listed reasons probably play some role in creating the disappointingly low college-readiness figures. In theory, schools have the most control over remedying reasons 2, 3, and 5. In practice, most
experiments innovations that schools implement only seem to make things worse.