Are a family’s financial circumstances considered when the University of Rochester awards merit scholarships? Let’s look at the facts.
From the University of Rochester website:
Merit-based scholarships range in amount from $2,000 per year to full-tuition. They are awarded to students who demonstrate outstanding academic achievement and potential, regardless of financial circumstances.…
We distribute merit-based aid regardless of a family’s demonstrated financial need.
But here’s what Jonathan Burdick, Rochester Dean of Admissions and Financial Aid, writes in a candid blog post about “12 steps that mattered for earning merit scholarships”.
We had a “progressive tax” in our merit. On average, each four dollars less in family income increased merit awards one cent. Not much impact per student, but noticeable overall.
According to this, a family’s “financial circumstances” are a factor in the distribution of so-called merit awards. I see a contradiction, even if unintended. Is this curious correlation a simple coincidence? What should families believe?
Here’s what Daniel de Vise of the Washington Post writes.
“Need-based” aid is fairly easy to predict; many colleges spell out their formulas so plainly that a student can calculate a likely aid award based on her or his household income. “Merit” aid is comparatively opaque, meted out in rough proportion to the applicant’s academic credentials.
Opaque, indeed. In reviewing college merit aid policies I have seen many instances of “hybrid” aid, where schools make it clear that both financial need and merit are considered. However, I have not been alone in wondering if some colleges also take financial need into account when dispensing what they label as merit aid while never disclosing this significant fact to families. It seems that the University of Rochester may have given us an example of this covert and confusing practice.
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.