… The faculty came up with six abilities they think every Sarah Lawrence graduate should have….
- Ability to think analytically about the material.
- Ability to express ideas effectively through written communication.
- Ability to exchange ideas effectively through oral communication.
- Ability to bring innovation to the work.
- Ability to envisage and carry through a project independently, with appropriate guidance.
- Ability to accept and act on critique to improve work.
These measures serve as an antidote to the Obama administration’s upcoming rating system, which will measure things like cost, graduation rates, and salaries of graduates. Obama’s new system has generated controversy, particularly since poor scores could mean the loss of federal financial aid.
Sarah Lawrence developed a “web-based assessment platform, designed to measure student performance against these critical abilities”. Advisors meet regularly with students to evaluate their progress.
That’s a different measure of the value of an education than, say, student loan debt or earnings after graduation — the sorts of things the Obama administration is considering as part of its ratings plan. Students and parents are right to ask if they’re getting their money’s worth, says the college’s president, Karen Lawrence. After financial aid, the average cost of a Sarah Lawrence education is almost $43,000 a year.
“People are worried about cost,” Lawrence says. “We understand that.”
And they’re worried about getting jobs after graduation. But she says the abilities that the new assessment measures—critical thinking and innovation and collaboration—are the same ones employers say they’re looking for.
I have a feeling every Sarah Lawrence graduate will be rated highly.
The idea behind Sarah Lawrence’s assessment is laudable, but I must say I’m a bit skeptical about the way they measure student performance. Shouldn’t they have an objective third party doing the assessment?