High school graduation goals do not include getting students ready for college

by Grace

Sadly, I was not surprised to learn that our local high school does not include “college or career ready” as part of its goals for graduates.

The district has adopted graduation goals. A graduate of the Eastchester Schools will be:

  • A respectful individual
  • A life-long learner
  • An effective communicator
  • A complex thinker and problem solver
  • A competent and responsible user of technology

Words have consequences.

At our local school only 59% of high school graduates are  “college or career ready” *.  This at an annual  cost of about $23,389 per pupil.

I prefer the Obama administration’s articulation of goals – much more specific, concrete, and measurable.

The goal for America’s educational system is clear: Every student should graduate from high school ready for college or a career.


Different school, similar problem
At a nearby school district, some parents are advocating that college preparation has to be front and center as goalsinstead of  other squishy priorities like global awareness, global responsibility, and 21st century skills.

* UPDATE:  I changed “college ready” to “college or career ready” to accurately reflect what was measured.  In other words, 59% were not prepared for “post-secondary” success as determined by New York’s Aspirational Performance Measure (APM).

7 Comments to “High school graduation goals do not include getting students ready for college”

  1. The last goal is the one that drives me nuts. How about producing competent creators of technology instead?
    That being said, I don’t think 59% is bad. Since I don’t think college is right for every kid, I don’t think that 100% need to end up being college ready. How about being “apprenticeship-ready”?

  2. Bonnie, you make a good point that 100% need not be college-ready. But I updated the post to correct my mistake in describing what was actually measured, which was college AND CAREER readiness. It makes sense to me, because there’s a minimum level of literacy and numeracy that should be attained for most jobs and apprenticeships. Although, I think it was a mistake for NY to change back to a system whereby only one type of high school diploma – Regents – is used for both college and career readiness.

  3. And I would need to be convinced that a goal for all high school graduates should be to produce competent “creators” of technology. I don’t see it.

  4. I don’t see how “career-ready” can be effectively measured. Its meaning probably varies by school district. In our district, a lot of those “non-career-ready” grads are going to go into the family construction business or dad’s pizzaria. They may not test that well on academic skills but they will be successful. A kid graduating in South Bronx, however, with poor reading skills is probably not career-ready simply because there are no built-in pathways to jobs for them.

    They should just remove the technology goal. I just hate the fact that being good at Powerpoint is now one of our graduation goals. What is technology anyway? Just a tool. If I can use my pencil well, I am also a technology user.

  5. Since you don’t believe “career-ready” can be effectively measured, do you think graduates should be measured on any basis?

    While I agree that career-ready can mean different things, I think schools should assess graduates on some basic level and label it as career-ready, for lack of a better label. There is value in knowing that information, giving most employers a standard of sorts on which to make hiring decisions.

    Although I normally scoff at what I consider the over-use of “21st century skills”, I like the idea of some kind of technology literacy goal. I’m not big on PowerPoint, but graduates should know how to do things like conduct Internet research and create Word documents.

  6. Does it have to be Word documents? What if they used (like my kids) Google Docs or OpenOffice instead? And how about being able to effectively do research? Why does it have to be Internet research specifically? Internet research is just one way, a massively over used way IMHO, to do research. And a research skill is a research skill.
    And, how much in the way of research skills does a kid who is planning to work in Dad’s body shop business really need?

    I don’t have a problem with assessing graduates, but I don’t like the term “career-ready” because I don’t think that is what they are assessing. Why can’t we just agree that society needs people who are literate to some fundamental level and who can do basic math and write grammatical sentences, because otherwise they can’t function in a democracy? Career-ready is a red herring.

  7. “Does it have to be Word documents?”
    Nope, I just used that as an example of word processing.

    “Why does it have to be Internet research specifically? ”
    I was giving examples of technology skills, and I think schools should explicitly teach Internet research. Leaving that out when teaching research would be a huge failing, IMO.

    I think “career-ready” is a pretty good designation, but I’m sure there are other terms that would also work. The body shop kid might be a good candidate for something else that could be called a “vocational” degree or similar. Maybe “democracy-ready” would be a good general standard, with several categories like the old days. But that’s probably not considered very PC these days.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.